Confronta modelli
Metti i modelli a confronto per prezzo, contesto, capacità e benchmark.
Ling 3.1 Flash is InclusionAI's (Ant Group) hybrid-reasoning Mixture-of-Experts model (560B total, 25B active parameters, 262K-token context), a much larger successor to the 124B Ling 3.0 Flash. This OpenRouter listing is free of token cost, making it a good fit for trying out strong reasoning, coding, and agentic workloads without spend.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash is DeepSeek's open-weight sparse MoE model and the first built on the company's Causal Encoder-Decoder architecture, activating 8B parameters on input and 16B on output with a 1M-token context window. It targets coding, terminal and computer-use agents, and long-horizon multi-step tasks as a low-cost, high-throughput sibling to DeepSeek's Pro line.
Benchmark
Punteggi testa a testa negli indici di ragionamento, programmazione e capacità agentiche, oltre alle classifiche per dominio.
Intelligenza
Programmazione
Ling 3.1 Flash non ha dati
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash non ha dati
Automazione e uso di strumenti
Ling 3.1 Flash non ha dati
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash non ha dati
Punteggi di intelligenza, programmazione e automazione tramite Artificial Analysis.
Software e servizi IT
arena.aiLing 3.1 Flash non ha dati
Confronti popolari
Gemini 4 Argon vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Sonnet 5.5 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Sonnet 5.5
Claude Fable 5.1 vs GPT-6 Astra
Grok 4.7 vs GPT-6.1 Sol
GPT-6.1 Sol vs Claude Opus 5.5
Gemini 3.8 Flash vs Claude Haiku 5.5
Mistral Large 4 vs Llama 4 Maverick
Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemini 4 Argon
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 vs Claude Opus 5.5
Claude Haiku 5.5 vs GPT-6 Luna
Kimi K3 vs Claude Fable 5.1
Qwen3.8 Max Prime vs Kimi K3
GLM 5.3 vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813